Review on Libertyfirsttrusts

LibertyFirstTrust.com presents itself as a customer-focused financial and logistics/shipping service offering accounts, deposits, debit cards and other banking-like products. The site features pages for opening accounts, savings and fixed deposit accounts boasting unusually high interest rates (claims up to 7–10%), and a registration flow for creating accounts. The site’s “About” and contact pages claim licensing (“Licensed by the Central Bank of United States”) and give a U.S. address and phone number, but there are multiple textual errors (misspellings, awkward phrasing) and suspicious details in the content and contact info that lower its trustworthiness.

On the technical side, the site appears hosted on an IP address that serves many domains (a common trait of low-cost shared hosting or mass-registered sites). The pages contain inconsistent copy (broken English and templated text), and the business claims (high yields, banking license names that do not match real U.S. regulators) are immediate red flags for anyone evaluating a financial or logistical service. Taken together, while the site looks functional and has pages typical of a bank/shipper, the combination of unrealistic product claims, poor copy, and questionable claims about licensing make it risky to treat the site as a trustworthy financial or logistics provider without independent verification.

More Details

Detailed reasoning (evidence and analysis):

1. Regulatory claim mismatch: A fundamental check for financial institutions is regulatory registration. LibertyFirstTrust.com’s claim of being “Licensed by the Central Bank of United States” is misleading—there is no entity known formally as the “Central Bank of United States” that regulates banks in the way the site suggests. In the U.S., federal banking regulators include the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC; state-chartered banks are regulated by state banking departments. A legitimate bank will list its exact regulator, a charter number, and verifiable registration details. The absence or misnaming of the regulator is a major red flag. 

2. Unusually high promised returns: The site advertises very high interest rates (7–10% for deposit products). For consumer banking in developed markets such rates are generally atypical and out of line with prevailing market rates—especially for liquid savings or short-term accounts. High yields are often used to attract deposits quickly; reputable banks that offer above-market returns provide clear regulatory disclosures and third-party verification (FDIC/NCUA membership, prospectuses, regulatory filings), none of which are clearly present on the site. 

3. Poor quality content & inconsistencies: The site contains misspellings (e.g., “Los San Ditego”), awkward sentences and copy that looks pasted or templated. Scammers commonly use hastily assembled sites with boilerplate copy and inconsistent details. Professional financial institutions invest in polished copy and accurate legal/regulatory text. 

4. Hosting/profile signals: The domain is hosted on an IP address that lists many domains. While not definitive proof of a scam (many legitimate small businesses use shared hosting), high domain proliferation on the same host is commonly observed for low-cost, bulk-registered sites used in scam networks. This calls for additional due diligence (whois registration, hosting history, SSL cert details). 

5. External warnings for similar names: Consumer protection and scam-watch resources sometimes list businesses with similar names or brand variants as unlicensed or suspicious. That doesn’t prove this exact domain is fraudulent, but it elevates risk and the need to verify through regulator lists and independent sources. 

6. Active account registration requesting personal data: The presence of an active registration page collecting personal information before legitimacy is proven is a practical risk—submitting ID, DOB, or financial details to an unverified entity risks identity theft and fraud. 

Conclusion of this section: given the combination of inaccurate regulatory claims, implausibly high returns, poor site copy, and hosting characteristics, the site should be considered unverified and risky. Treat it as potentially fraudulent until you can confirm registration with real banking regulators, verify an official physical office, and obtain independent customer testimonials or regulatory license numbers.