Review on Raincoat1
Disclaimer
Our reviews are subjective opinions based on the analysis of our independent writers from around the world. We recommend exercising your own judgment and verifying information independently. We cannot be held liable for decisions made based on our reviews.
Summary
About Raincoat1
Our analysis of raincoat.com reveals a long‑tenured, well‑configured domain backed by reputable infrastructure (Squarespace registrar, Google Cloud name servers, DNSSEC enabled). While the registrant is privacy‑redacted, the state/province listed as PR (Puerto Rico) and the site’s disaster‑resilience positioning align, and we see no hallmarks of quick‑turn fraud.
More Details
Verdict: Low immediate fraud risk. The domain’s age, DNSSEC, Google Cloud DNS, and reputable registrar outweigh the transparency limits from privacy redaction. Proceed, but verify corporate identity and any regulatory licensing before sharing sensitive data or entering commercial agreements.
Warning: Low score, please avoid this website!
According to our review, this website has a higher risk of being a scam website.
It may attempt to steal your funds under the pretense of helping you make money.
Notice: High Score — Not likely to be a scam website.
According to our review, this website has a low risk of being a scam.
There is minimal indication of fraudulent activity.
Notice: Moderate score — Caution advised.
According to our review, this website shows a moderate risk level based on current data.
There is no strong evidence of a scam, but users should proceed carefully.
0
5 Stars
0
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
0
1 Stars
0
Competiting Brands
Photos of Raincoat1
Pros
- Very long domain history (since 1997), atypical for fraudulent operations that favor new or disposable domains.
- Reputable registrar (Squarespace Domains II LLC) with defined abuse channels and policy compliance history.
- Enterprise‑grade DNS via Google Cloud and DNSSEC enabled, indicating deliberate security configuration.
- Protective EPP locks active, reducing the risk of unauthorized transfer or deletion.
Cons
- Registrant details are privacy‑redacted, which limits open‑source attribution and independent verification.
- Recent registrar update (2025‑06‑03) could reflect portfolio migration or ownership/admin change; without historical WHOIS, continuity cannot be fully confirmed.
- Limited publicly visible information in the snippet prevents confirming licensing, corporate entity details, and regulated‑product disclosures.
- Puerto Rico (PR) indication is plausible but not definitive proof of the legal entity; users should verify corporate registration and any insurance/financial licenses if applicable.
- The domain’s high‑value, generic dictionary word could have had multiple historical owners; absent a full timeline, brand continuity cannot be asserted.
- Contact routing via registrar privacy webform (rather than a direct corporate email in WHOIS) reduces traceability for abuse reporting outside the registrar channel.
Website Overview
Country:
Unknow
Operating Since:
Recently
Platforms:
Desktop, Mobile
Type:
Website
Spread:
N/A
Funding:
Website
Leverage:
N/A
Commission:
N/A
Instruments:
N/A
Keypoints
Domain age and tenure: registered June 19, 1997, indicating nearly three decades of history—an outlier compared with the short‑lived domains commonly used in scams.
Registrar and reputation: managed by Squarespace Domains II LLC (IANA 895), a mainstream provider with clear abuse contacts; this follows the industry‑wide migration of Google Domains portfolios to Squarespace.
Name servers and hosting posture: ns‑cloud‑e1/e2/e3/e4.googledomains.com suggest Google Cloud DNS; this is enterprise‑grade and widely used by legitimate companies.
Security hardening: DNSSEC is active (signed delegation with DS record published), and EPP locks (clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited) are in place—controls that reduce hijack and spoofing risk.
Overall Score
12%
Final Thoughts
After viewing and analyzing the site thoroughly by our experts and undergoing the proper process, we have reached a final conclusion.
The domain history suggests stability and deliberate operational hygiene rather than opportunistic abuse. A 1997 creation date, migration into Squarespace’s registrar ecosystem (consistent with the Google Domains transition), Google Cloud DNS, and DNSSEC all point to a professionally maintained asset. The privacy shield is a standard practice that modestly reduces transparency but does not, on its own, imply risk—especially given the PR/US geographic hint aligning with a disaster‑resilience theme. We found no structural indicators typically associated with phishing or investment fraud (e.g., freshly minted registration, churned name servers, or exotic registrar/hosting pairings). For users and partners, the prudent path is standard due diligence: confirm the legal entity behind the brand, match website contact details to verified corporate channels, and—if products touch regulated areas like insurance or financial services—validate applicable licenses in the stated jurisdictions. Barring contrary evidence from deeper content or third‑party complaints, raincoat.com presently reads as a low‑risk, professionally managed domain.
Comments