Review on Royalexpressdeliveries
Disclaimer
Our reviews are subjective opinions based on the analysis of our independent writers from around the world. We recommend exercising your own judgment and verifying information independently. We cannot be held liable for decisions made based on our reviews.
Summary
About Royalexpressdeliveries
The website in question, Royal Express Deliveries (accessible via the domain: royalexpressdeliveries.com), presents itself as a full-service international logistics and shipping provider. According to its “Privacy Policy” page, it states the company offers warehousing, air freight, ocean freight, road freight, supply chain solutions and packaging, serving clients in multiple industries (retail & consumer, sciences & healthcare, industrial & chemical, oil & gas).
The site claims to have global reach and long-standing operations (“© 2001–2025 Royal Express Deliveries”).
Despite these claims, independent trust-analysis websites flag serious concerns. For example, one review gives the site a score of 38.3/100, calling it “Questionable. Controversial. Flagged.” and highlighting its creation date of June 22 2023.
In short: the site presents a standard logistics business façade but under independent scrutiny shows multiple red flags which suggest you should proceed with extreme caution if at all.
More Details
When we delve deeper into whether royalexpressdeliveries.com is legitimate, the weight of evidence leans heavily towards it being high-risk and quite possibly a scam rather than a fully credible logistics provider.
-
Business claims vs facts: The website asserts a long operational history (“2001-2025”), global services, warehousing, and freight forwarding. Yet independent data shows the domain was only created in mid-2023. That discrepancy suggests the history is likely fabricated to inspire trust.
-
Lack of transparency: Legitimate freight/shipping companies typically provide clear information about their company registration, physical headquarters, management team, association memberships (e.g., IATA, FIATA, national freight forwarding associations), customer testimonials or case studies. Here, that information is missing or extremely limited.
-
Low trust index by independent evaluators: The site has been flagged by ScamDetector with a trust score of 38.3/100, categorised as “Questionable. Controversial. Flagged.” meaning many indicators of legitimacy are missing.
-
Typical scam-industry patterns: Shipping/logistics scams often work by presenting a plausible business front, then asking the victim for an up-front payment (pay customs duties, release fees, handling charges), sometimes followed by increasingly large additional fees, or data theft. The industry context recognizes such patterns. The website in question exhibits many of the risk factors: a newly-created domain, vague contact details, grandiose claims without verification.
-
Mismatch of metrics: A company claiming large-scale global operations should have a measurable web footprint (reviews, traffic, client mentions). The fact that the independent scoring tools see very low traffic/visibility further supports suspicion.
-
Potential for personal data risk: The site's privacy policy indicates it collects personal data and may transfer it across jurisdictions. While that is standard, combined with the risk profile it raises concerns about what happens to such data if the business is not truly legitimate.
-
Recommendation based on risk: Given the evidence, one should treat any engagement with caution. If you are asked to pay large sums ahead of service, or provide sensitive personal or banking information, the chances of being scammed increase significantly.
Thus, while I cannot prove with absolute certainty that the website is a complete fraud (since many scams mimic genuine operations until they are exposed), the strong accumulation of red flags leads to a reasoned conclusion: the site is not trustworthy and is best treated as likely a scam.
Warning: Low score, please avoid this website!
According to our review, this website has a higher risk of being a scam website.
It may attempt to steal your funds under the pretense of helping you make money.
Notice: High Score — Not likely to be a scam website.
According to our review, this website has a low risk of being a scam.
There is minimal indication of fraudulent activity.
Notice: Moderate score — Caution advised.
According to our review, this website shows a moderate risk level based on current data.
There is no strong evidence of a scam, but users should proceed carefully.
0
5 Stars
0
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
0
1 Stars
0
Competiting Brands
Photos of Royalexpressdeliveries
Pros
- he website has an SSL certificate, so traffic between your browser and the site is encrypted (which is at least a minimum standard).
- The layout and description of services are consistent with what you might expect from a logistics provider: warehousing, freight forwarding, supply chain. On the surface, it looks legitimate.
- The presence of a detailed privacy policy may suggest the operator has taken some steps to appear compliant.
Cons
- Very low trust score and many red flags (domain age, lack of verifiable business registration, minimal public reputation).
- Mismatch between claimed years of operation (since 2001) and actual domain creation (2023).
- Absence of credible client testimonials, public case studies or media mentions verifying their operations.
- High risk of it being a façade: Because shipping/logistics scams often work by asking for upfront payment for “customs clearance”, “import duties”, or “release fees”, and then either disappearing or performing poorly. The business model claimed is attractive to scammers.
Website Overview
Country:
USA
Operating Since:
2024
Platforms:
Mobile/Desktop
Type:
Shipping/logistic
Spread:
N/A
Funding:
Shipping/logistic
Leverage:
N/A
Commission:
N/A
Instruments:
N/A
Keypoints
Low trust score: A trust rating of ~38/100 means most of the parameters (ownership transparency, history, traffic, reputation) are weak.
Ownership / identity transparency missing: There is little publicly verifiable information about the actual business registration, management team or verified customer base on the website itself.
Grand claims without verifiable evidence: The site claims services across air, ocean, road freight, packaging, warehousing, for many industries. But I could not find credible third-party testimonials or media references to back up such a broad operation.
Generic privacy policy and content: The privacy policy is long and uses standard template language; the “About Us” or other sections do not supply clear physical addresses, detailed company history or references.
Overall Score
11%
Final Thoughts
After viewing and analyzing the site thoroughly by our experts and undergoing the proper process, we have reached a final conclusion.
In conclusion, although royalexpressdeliveries.com seems built to look like a legitimate global logistics provider, the underlying evidence points in the other direction. The significant mismatch between claimed history/scale and verifiable facts (domain age, lack of independent presence), the very low trust score and the generic presentation all raise major concerns. For anyone considering using this service — particularly if you are being asked to pay fees up-front, to provide sensitive personal or business documents, or to trust delivery of high-value items — you should think twice.
My strong recommendation: Unless you can independently verify this company’s physical address, registration with relevant industry associations, obtain credible references from other businesses that have used them, and secure the payment terms (for example escrow or payment only after service), you should avoid engaging with it. The risk of financial loss, non-delivery, or identity/data exposure is high.
For those in Nigeria (or elsewhere) looking to ship items internationally, go instead with well-known, widely-reviewed logistics providers with verifiable track records, transparent terms and strong reviews. When an operation appears to tick many boxes of a scam set-up, yet lacks the verifiable depth, it is prudent to walk away.
Comments