
Review on Whogohost
Summary
About Whogohost
The platform markets itself as a web hosting provider with a focus on African markets, but inconsistencies in ownership transparency and operational history warrant scrutiny.
More Details
Verdict: Proceed with caution—established infrastructure clashes with transparency gaps.

Warning: Low score, please avoid this website!
According to our review, this website has a higher risk of being a scam website.
It may attempt to steal your funds under the pretense of helping you make money.
Notice: High Score — Not likely to be a scam website.
According to our review, this website has a low risk of being a scam.
There is minimal indication of fraudulent activity.
Notice: Moderate score — Caution advised.
According to our review, this website shows a moderate risk level based on current data.
There is no strong evidence of a scam, but users should proceed carefully.
Photos of Whogohost
Pros
- Established domain history (active since 2007).
- Self-hosted infrastructure suggests technical capability.
- Clear regional focus with localized server names.
- Long-term domain registration signals commitment.
Cons
- Repetitive contact details for all roles (owner, admin, tech) create oversight risks.
- Lack of DNSSEC leaves DNS records vulnerable to spoofing.
- Inaccessible content due to Cloudflare error message during review.
- No visible third-party user reviews or verified testimonials.
Website Overview
Country:
Unknow
Operating Since:
Recently
Platforms:
Desktop, Mobile
Type:
Website
Spread:
N/A
Funding:
Website
Leverage:
N/A
Commission:
N/A
Instruments:
N/A
Keypoints
Domain registration dates back to 2007, suggesting long-term operation, but WHOIS records show repetitive contact details for owner, admin, and tech roles.
Nameservers are self-hosted (abuja.ns.whogohost.com, lagos.ns.whogohost.com), a common practice for established providers.
Registrar Web4Africa Inc. lists a South African address and phone number, aligning with the platform’s regional focus.
No DNSSEC implementation detected, raising minor security concerns.
Overall Score
Final Thoughts
After viewing and analyzing the site thoroughly by our experts and undergoing the proper process, we have reached a final conclusion.
While the site appears operational and regionally focused, its opaque ownership structure and lack of verifiable user feedback make it difficult to fully endorse. Prospective users should independently verify support responsiveness before committing.
Comments